Call Us Today For A Free Quote | 866.940.1101
Professionals Insuring Professionals

Lee NorcrossAttorneys are very intelligent creative people.  Lawyers Professional Liability Insurance Extended Reporting Period Endorsements (ERP or Tail) are expensive.  In trying to figure out ways to avoid buying a Lawyers Professional Liability Insurance Extended Reporting Period Endorsement and save money, Lawyers have come up with some very creative solutions. All are very bad ideas.  Here is one of many.

A three member law firm decides to end their partnership.  The firm is splitting up 1/3, 1/3, 1/3.  The firm is advised to buy an ERP for the Firm’s current Attorney Malpractice policy as none of the new firms will constitute a predecessor firm for insurance purposes.   (Most Lawyers Professional Liability Insurance policies require at least a majority of the assets come to the new firm to be a predecessor firm.)

The firm decides that purchasing an ERP is too expensive.  So they agree that each member will buy a new attorney malpractice policy with “career coverage”, to protect each attorneys individual past acts.  All of the attorneys knowing that if they get sued for something that happened at the old firm the individual attorney that performed the act has coverage, but the other members will not.  To address the lack of coverage, the members of the firm decide to draft a side agreement, that obligates each attorney to cover any matter that might arise from the old firm and to be covered equally 1/3, 1/3, 1/3.  Problem with this is that their new malpractice insurance carriers are not obligated to provide a defense or coverage based on this agreement.

The firm splits up.  Problems with the firm’s idea to not buy a firm ERP start from the very beginning.  One of the members decides not to purchase a new policy on a timely basis.  Member does eventually purchase a new policy but because it took so long it was done without prior acts coverage.

About a year later, the member that did not have “career coverage” gets sued for work done while at the old firm.  The suit not only names this individual member, but the other 2 former members of the firm individually and as a firm.  The 2 former members that had “career coverage” are provided a defense by their new malpractice carriers.  But they were left to pay the damages out of their own pocket which.  The settlement was many times what the cost of the ERP would have been.  As expected the side agreement of “mutual aid” was not honored by their malpractice carriers.

Share |

No Comments

Post a Comment
Required (Not Displayed)

All comments are moderated and stripped of HTML.
Submission Validation
Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
Enter the Validation Code from above.
NOTICE: This blog and website are made available by the publisher for educational and informational purposes only. It is not be used as a substitute for competent insurance, legal, or tax advice from a licensed professional in your state. By using this blog site you understand that there is no broker client relationship between you and the blog and website publisher.
Blog Archive
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2013
  • 2011

View Mobile Version
Quick Contact
We love referrals! And thank you even more for your continued business.
Customer Service
Self policy service any time of the day, directly from our website.
Join Our Newsletter
Stay in touch with the latest events, news and offers we have.
From Our Blog From Our Customers
Read More Read More
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google Maps
Stay In Touch With Us Helpful Site Links Contact Us
Sign up now to receive new and updates 5075 Cascade Rd. SE, Ste. E
Grand Rapids, MI 49546

Local: 616.940.1101
Toll Free: 866.940.1101
We have the expertise to find you the right coverage at the right price 
Powered by Insurance Website Builder