Call Us 866.940.1101 ☰ ˟
866.940.1101
Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Employee Directory
    • Partners Page
    • Event Calendar
    • Refer a Friend
  • Get A Quote
  • Products
    • Lawyers Malpractice Insurance
    • Professional Liability Coverage For Attorneys
    • Accountants Professional Liability
    • Dentist Malpractice Insurance
    • Business Owners Policy
    • Cyber Liability Insurance
    • Workers Compensation Insurance
    • Title Agents E&O Insurance
    • Paralegal Malpractice Insurance
  • Testimonials
  • Common Terms
    • Common Terms
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Areas We Serve
    • Grand Rapids, MI
    • Detroit, MI
    • Lansing, MI
    • Kalamazoo, MI
Home > Blog > Ethics opinion on fee-sharing is bad news for Avvo Legal Services
FRIDAY, AUGUST 12, 2016

Ethics opinion on fee-sharing is bad news for Avvo Legal Services

Ethics OpinionPOSTED AUG 11, 2016 03:12 PM CDT

BY DEBRA CASSENS WEISS

A South Carolina ethics opinion on fee-sharing highlights a potential obstacle for Avvo’s fixed-fee legal referral service, launched this year in 18 states.

The July 14 advisory opinion—which describes a payment setup like the one used by Avvo Legal Services—is bad news for Avvo, according to Law Sites by Robert Ambrogi.

Avvo’s service matches lawyers willing to provide defined legal services with clients who pay a fee up front, Ambrogi explains in his blog post. Lawyers receive earned fees from Avvo once a month, and Avvo takes its marketing fee from the lawyers’ accounts in a separate transaction. The fee varies based on the type of legal service provided.

The South Carolina ethics opinion targets the variable nature of the marketing fee. The arrangement violates the general ban on sharing fees with nonlawyers, and in the alternative, violates the ban on paying for a referral, the ethics opinion says.

“A lawyer cannot do indirectly what would be prohibited if done directly,” the opinion says. “Allowing the service to indirectly take a portion of the attorney’s fee by disguising it in two separate transactions does not negate the fact that the service is claiming a certain portion of the fee earned by the lawyer as its ‘per service marketing fee.’ ”

In addition, the marketing fee must represent the reasonable cost of the service, according to the opinion. “In essence, the service’s charges amount to a contingency advertising fee arrangement rather than a cost that can be assessed for reasonableness by looking at market rate or comparable services,” the opinion said.

“Presumably, it does not cost the service any more to advertise online for a family law matter than for the preparation of corporate documents,” the opinion continued. “There does not seem to be any rational basis for charging the attorney more for the advertising services of one type of case versus another.”

Avvo’s chief legal officer, Josh King, tells the ABA Journal that the service is signing up lawyers in South Carolina and plans to launch there soon. The lawyer FAQ page is here.

King points out that the opinion is advisory and Avvo disagrees with the conclusions. “We’ve looked at the rules. We have our own interpretation of the rules,” he tells the ABA Journal

King says Avvo Legal Services is a “marketplace,” rather than a referral service, and the fees paid by lawyers to Avvo “scale very directly” with the costs incurred by Avvo. The costs of legal services provided through the marketplace range from $39 to $4,000, and that results in different credit card fees and different risks in the event of refunds, King says.

The ethics rules, King adds, should be interpreted based on potential consumer harm, and lawyer advertising rules should be narrowly tailored to avoid First Amendment violations. “We really built the product looking at the consumer benefit and trying to navigate through the rules,” he said.

When ethics regulators construe ethics rules, consumer harm “should be inquiry No. 1,” King asserts. The ethics opinion is “unfortunate in that it doesn’t consider any consumer benefits.”

Related article:

ABA Journal: “Is Avvo’s fixed-cost service a fee-sharing violation?”

Posted 9:40 PM

Tags: legal liability, attorney malpractice insurance, lawyers professional liability insurance, attorney malpractice, ethics, fee sharing
Share |


No Comments


Post a Comment
Required
Required (Not Displayed)
Required


All comments are moderated and stripped of HTML.

NOTICE: This blog and website are made available by the publisher for educational and informational purposes only. It is not be used as a substitute for competent insurance, legal, or tax advice from a licensed professional in your state. By using this blog site you understand that there is no broker client relationship between you and the blog and website publisher.
Blog Archive
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2013
  • 2011

  • lawyers professional liability insurance(429)
  • attorney malpractice insurance(400)
  • attorney malpractice(337)
  • legal malpractice(225)
  • legal liability(134)
  • cyber insurance(106)
  • data breach(92)
  • ethics(87)
  • erp(57)
  • malpractice insurance(55)
  • claims(39)
  • title agency e&o(36)
  • accountant e&o(34)
  • extended reporting period endorsement(30)
  • tail(29)
  • phishing(25)
  • legal malpractice insurance(23)
  • prior acts(22)
  • claims made coverage(21)
  • extended reporting period(21)
  • cyber security(20)
  • cyber liability(18)
  • accountant errors & omissions(18)
  • claims reporting(18)
  • crime insurance(16)
  • ransomware(16)
  • claim prevention(16)
  • attorney protective cle(14)
  • the hartford weekly newsletter(14)
  • attorney protective cle webinar(14)
  • 2022 mcgowan pro cpe webinar for accountants(13)
  • professional liability insurance(13)
  • mcgowan webinar series for cpas 2021(12)
  • retirement tail(12)
  • attpro tip of the month(12)
  • business owners insurance(11)
  • legal liability insurance(11)
  • fee suits(10)
  • full prior acts(10)
  • cyber crime(10)
  • accountant errors & omissions insurance(10)
  • prior acts date(9)
  • step rating(9)
  • non-practicing erp(9)
  • bop(9)
  • cyber liability insurance(9)
  • title agent errors & omissions(9)
  • claims made(9)
  • coverage(8)
  • webinar(8)

View Mobile Version
Logo
Quick Links
Home Our Products Customer Service Payment Options Common Terms
About Us Refer A Friend Our Carriers Blog Contact Us
Location
2430 Camelot Ct SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49546

Local: 616.940.1101
Toll Free: 866.940.1101
Email: info@L2ins.com
Facebook Twitter Social LinkedIn
© Copyright. All rights reserved.
Powered by Insurance Website Builder