Call Us 866.940.1101 ☰ ˟
866.940.1101
Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Employee Directory
    • Partners Page
    • Event Calendar
    • Refer a Friend
  • Get A Quote
  • Products
    • Lawyers Malpractice Insurance
    • Professional Liability Coverage For Attorneys
    • Accountants Professional Liability
    • Dentist Malpractice Insurance
    • Business Owners Policy
    • Cyber Liability Insurance
    • Workers Compensation Insurance
    • Title Agents E&O Insurance
    • Paralegal Malpractice Insurance
  • Testimonials
  • Common Terms
    • Common Terms
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Areas We Serve
    • Grand Rapids, MI
    • Detroit, MI
    • Lansing, MI
    • Kalamazoo, MI
Home > Blog > When Attorney Malpractice Policy’s Duty to Defend is not a Duty to Defend
THURSDAY, MARCH 7, 2019

When Attorney Malpractice Policy’s Duty to Defend is not a Duty to Defend

Court RulingAttorney Malpractice Insurance policies are generally written as a ‘Duty to Defend’ policy.  With a Duty to Defend policy the insured has an expectation that if a claim is brought against the insured that the insurer will step up to the plate and provide a defense for the insured.  In conjunction with providing a defense the insured has an expectation for indemnification for damages relating to professional services. 

Insureds need to understand that an attorney malpractice policy is not an ‘All Risk’ policy.

The case of Ben Li et al. v. Ironshore Indemnity Inc is a good example of when the policy exclusions and un-insurability under state law comes into place there will be no Duty to Defend and no indemnification.

Attorney Martinez settled a malpractice claim in arbitration and assigned all rights to his clients for any claims against the insurer, Ironshore Indemnity.  The arbitrator required Attorney Martinez to forfeit fees paid in the FDIC litigation which totaled over $650,000 in addition to client’s attorney’s fees and costs.  Ironshore Indemnity refused to provide a defense and refused to pay any indemnification due to exclusion M in their policy which in part states:

“coverage does not extend to payments in connection with any claim “alleging, arising out of, based upon or attributable to the conversion, misappropriation, improper commingling of client funds, the return of or restitution, or disgorgement of fees, costs and expenses, or other amounts . . . .”

We have blogged about this before that the exclusion for attorney’s fees is a common exclusion with almost all attorney malpractice insurance policies.  Through the years, many attorneys seemed surprised and angered when learning about this exclusion.

Suit was filed against Ironshore Insurance in Federal District Court in 2017 where it was dismissed on summary judgement.  It was appealed to the 9th US Circuit which affirmed the district court’s ruling.  The 9th circuit in affirming the decision also went on to state that:

“Finally, even if the policy exclusion does not apply, Martinez’s claim—seeking restitution for the overbilling of his clients—is uninsurable as a matter of Texas law.”

 

Lee Norcross 
Contact Me Today
Lee Norcross, MBA, CPCU

Managing Director, CEO
Click here to contact Lee Norcross, MBA, CPCU

(616) 940-1101 Ext. 7080 
Posted 7:00 AM

Tags: attorney malpractice insurance, duty to defend
Share |


No Comments


Post a Comment
Required
Required (Not Displayed)
Required


All comments are moderated and stripped of HTML.

NOTICE: This blog and website are made available by the publisher for educational and informational purposes only. It is not be used as a substitute for competent insurance, legal, or tax advice from a licensed professional in your state. By using this blog site you understand that there is no broker client relationship between you and the blog and website publisher.
Blog Archive
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2013
  • 2011

  • lawyers professional liability insurance(429)
  • attorney malpractice insurance(398)
  • attorney malpractice(337)
  • legal malpractice(225)
  • legal liability(134)
  • cyber insurance(106)
  • data breach(92)
  • ethics(87)
  • erp(57)
  • malpractice insurance(55)
  • claims(39)
  • title agency e&o(36)
  • accountant e&o(34)
  • extended reporting period endorsement(30)
  • tail(29)
  • phishing(25)
  • legal malpractice insurance(23)
  • prior acts(22)
  • claims made coverage(21)
  • extended reporting period(21)
  • cyber security(20)
  • cyber liability(18)
  • accountant errors & omissions(18)
  • claims reporting(18)
  • crime insurance(16)
  • ransomware(16)
  • claim prevention(16)
  • attorney protective cle(14)
  • the hartford weekly newsletter(14)
  • attorney protective cle webinar(14)
  • 2022 mcgowan pro cpe webinar for accountants(13)
  • professional liability insurance(13)
  • mcgowan webinar series for cpas 2021(12)
  • retirement tail(12)
  • attpro tip of the month(12)
  • business owners insurance(11)
  • legal liability insurance(11)
  • fee suits(10)
  • full prior acts(10)
  • cyber crime(10)
  • accountant errors & omissions insurance(10)
  • prior acts date(9)
  • step rating(9)
  • non-practicing erp(9)
  • bop(9)
  • cyber liability insurance(9)
  • title agent errors & omissions(9)
  • claims made(9)
  • webinar(8)
  • lawyers(8)

View Mobile Version
Logo
Quick Links
Home Our Products Customer Service Payment Options Common Terms
About Us Refer A Friend Our Carriers Blog Contact Us
Location
2430 Camelot Ct SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49546

Local: 616.940.1101
Toll Free: 866.940.1101
Email: info@L2ins.com
Facebook Twitter Social LinkedIn
© Copyright. All rights reserved.
Powered by Insurance Website Builder