Call Us 866.940.1101 ☰ ˟
866.940.1101
Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Employee Directory
    • Partners Page
    • Event Calendar
    • Refer a Friend
  • Get A Quote
  • Products
    • Lawyers Malpractice Insurance
    • Professional Liability Coverage For Attorneys
    • Accountants Professional Liability
    • Dentist Malpractice Insurance
    • Business Owners Policy
    • Cyber Liability Insurance
    • Workers Compensation Insurance
    • Title Agents E&O Insurance
    • Paralegal Malpractice Insurance
  • Testimonials
  • Common Terms
    • Common Terms
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Areas We Serve
    • Grand Rapids, MI
    • Detroit, MI
    • Lansing, MI
    • Kalamazoo, MI
Home > Blog > US Courts Shining a Light on Litigation Funding
FRIDAY, MARCH 23, 2018

US Courts Shining a Light on Litigation Funding

There are many reasons that a person or entity might want to provide funding helping a plaintiff pursue a commercial lawsuit.  It can be for personal reasons such as promoting a cause or settling a score.  But most litigation funding is now coming from professional  3rd parties that make a business on betting which cases will be successful. 

The funding can be in the form of 3rd party financing in exchange for a portion of a successful verdict.  It can also be in the form on an insurance policy where an insurer provides coverage for the litigation expenses if the case is unsuccessful.  Given this financing the plaintiff and plaintiff lawyer motives may change which lawsuits are filed, the amount of a settlement and whether the lawsuit is settled.

3rd party financing entities are raising hundreds of millions of dollars to finance lawsuits.  It is now a big lucrative business.  According The Wall Street Journal, most 3rd party financing is subject to nondisclosure agreements with most arrangements kept secret.  That is starting to change.

Under pressure from corporate defendants, some courts are starting to require 3rd party funding be disclosed.  The US District Court of the Northern District of California has amended their rules to require discloser of 3rd party funders.

“(2) To include in the Standing Order For All Judges of the Northern District of California the following provision to be added at the end of existing paragraph 19 on page 2: “in any proposed class, collective, or representative action, the required disclosure includes any person or entity that is funding the prosecution of any claim or counterclaim.

“19. Disclosure of Non-party Interested Entities or Persons: Whether each party has filed the “Certification of Interested Entities or Persons” required by Civil Local Rule 3-15. In addition, each party must restate in the case management statement the contents of its certification by identifying any persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other entities known by the party to have either: (i) a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding; or (ii) any other kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. In any proposed class, collective, or representative action, the required disclosure includes any person or entity that is funding the prosecution of any claim or counterclaim.”

It is likely that other courts may require similar disclosures in the future.  Ultimately, whether these disclosers impact lawsuits brought and there outcome only time will tell.

Posted 3:42 PM

Tags: legal malpractice, attorney malpractice, lawyers professional liability insurance, ethics, litigation funding
Share |


No Comments


Post a Comment
Required
Required (Not Displayed)
Required


All comments are moderated and stripped of HTML.

NOTICE: This blog and website are made available by the publisher for educational and informational purposes only. It is not be used as a substitute for competent insurance, legal, or tax advice from a licensed professional in your state. By using this blog site you understand that there is no broker client relationship between you and the blog and website publisher.
Blog Archive
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2013
  • 2011

  • lawyers professional liability insurance(429)
  • attorney malpractice insurance(398)
  • attorney malpractice(337)
  • legal malpractice(225)
  • legal liability(134)
  • cyber insurance(106)
  • data breach(92)
  • ethics(87)
  • erp(57)
  • malpractice insurance(55)
  • claims(39)
  • title agency e&o(36)
  • accountant e&o(34)
  • extended reporting period endorsement(30)
  • tail(29)
  • phishing(25)
  • legal malpractice insurance(23)
  • prior acts(22)
  • claims made coverage(21)
  • extended reporting period(21)
  • cyber security(20)
  • cyber liability(18)
  • accountant errors & omissions(18)
  • claims reporting(18)
  • crime insurance(16)
  • ransomware(16)
  • claim prevention(16)
  • attorney protective cle(14)
  • the hartford weekly newsletter(14)
  • attorney protective cle webinar(14)
  • 2022 mcgowan pro cpe webinar for accountants(13)
  • professional liability insurance(13)
  • mcgowan webinar series for cpas 2021(12)
  • retirement tail(12)
  • attpro tip of the month(12)
  • business owners insurance(11)
  • legal liability insurance(11)
  • fee suits(10)
  • full prior acts(10)
  • cyber crime(10)
  • accountant errors & omissions insurance(10)
  • prior acts date(9)
  • step rating(9)
  • non-practicing erp(9)
  • bop(9)
  • cyber liability insurance(9)
  • title agent errors & omissions(9)
  • claims made(9)
  • webinar(8)
  • lawyers(8)

View Mobile Version
Logo
Quick Links
Home Our Products Customer Service Payment Options Common Terms
About Us Refer A Friend Our Carriers Blog Contact Us
Location
2430 Camelot Ct SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49546

Local: 616.940.1101
Toll Free: 866.940.1101
Email: info@L2ins.com
Facebook Twitter Social LinkedIn
© Copyright. All rights reserved.
Powered by Insurance Website Builder