Call Us 866.940.1101 ☰ ˟
866.940.1101
Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Employee Directory
    • Partners Page
    • Event Calendar
    • Refer a Friend
  • Get A Quote
  • Products
    • Lawyers Malpractice Insurance
    • Professional Liability Coverage For Attorneys
    • Accountants Professional Liability
    • Dentist Malpractice Insurance
    • Business Owners Policy
    • Cyber Liability Insurance
    • Workers Compensation Insurance
    • Title Agents E&O Insurance
    • Paralegal Malpractice Insurance
  • Testimonials
  • Common Terms
    • Common Terms
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Areas We Serve
    • Grand Rapids, MI
    • Detroit, MI
    • Lansing, MI
    • Kalamazoo, MI
Home > Blog > The 'Hammer' Clause in a Malpractice Insurance Policy
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2018

The 'Hammer' Clause in a Malpractice Insurance Policy

Hammer Clause

The Hammer Clause in a Malpractice Insurance Policy

Question:

An agent told me that my Attorney Malpractice Insurance policy has a ‘Hammer Clause’.  I looked in my policy and could not find it.  What is a ‘Hammer Clause’?

Response:

There is no malpractice insurance policy that actually states or defines a ‘Hammer Clause’.    It is insurance slang term for forcing you to settle a claim.

Follow-up Question:

Sounds like a bad thing.  How does a ‘Hammer Clause’ work?

Response:

A good professional errors and omissions insurance policy gives the right to the professional to not settle a claim even if the insurer wants to.  As a professional you may not want to settle because you feel that you did nothing wrong and it will damage your reputation or you want your day in court to be vindicated.  You also do not want a ‘claim’ settled when you did nothing wrong because it will end up on your loss history costing you more for insurance premiums in the future. But we do not live in a perfect world.

The reality is that an experienced insurer claims department and/or experience malpractice defense attorney should have handle hundreds of malpractice cases.  Many of the cases were very similar to your own.  Given the facts of the case, the assigned attorney should be able to estimate chances of winning, the cost to defend the claim, and the ultimate indemnity payment.  If a case goes to trial the defense costs alone could exceed the costs of settling the claim.  And there are no guarantees once a case goes to trial as to the final outcome.  And as far as the malpractice insurer and potential insurers are concerned given a $500,000 defense bill with no indemnity payment versus a $25,000 settlement, guess which insured will get the better insurance rate.  Sorry to say for most insurers it not a question of who’s right, but how much it costs.

If the case is not settled before trial, be prepared for depositions, producing documents, and a large amount of your personal time assisting in the defense of the claim. 

Given these facts, most professionals want claims settled quickly.  But say you don’t want to go along with the insurer claims department or malpractice attorney recommendation.  It is your right as a professional to refuse to settle.  Now what happens?

The Hammer Clause:

The malpractice insurance policy Insuring Agreements or Defense & Settlement sections state that even though the insurer will not settle a claim without the insured’s consent, the insurer’s exposure to the loss is limited to the amount that would have been paid if the insured had taken the insurer’s recommendation.  In other words, if an insured does not accept the insurer’s recommendation, then the insured is liable for any additional costs.  In essence the insurer can put the ‘Hammer’ to you if you do not settle when they recommend.

This is a sample of what is commonly referred to as a ‘Hammer Clause’ from a Valiant Lawyers Professional Liability policy form:

“C.    Settlement

The Company shall have the right to negotiate a settlement or compromise of a claim as it deems appropriate but shall not commit to settlement of a claim without the written consent of the Named Insured. If the Named Insured refuses to consent to a settlement or compromise recommended by the Company and acceptable to the claimant, then the Company’s Limits of Liability under this Policy shall be reduced to the amount for which the claim could have been compromised or settled, plus all claim expenses incurred up to the time the Company makes its recommendation, which amount shall not exceed the remainder of the Limits of Liability specified in Section III. A”

 

This is a sample Lawyers Professional Liability policy from Professional Solutions policy that does not contain a “Hammer Clause”.

“Section II. DEFENSE AND SETTLEMENT

 

3.  We will not settle a Claim without the Insured’s written, faxed, or emailed consent. Your consent shall not be required to make a settlement or payment after a judgment has been entered against you.”

 

 

Given this it is better to not have then to have a ‘Hammer Clause’. Reality is that in most cases, you want to get on with life and follow the insurer’s recommendation anyway. So the practical impact rarely comes into play.

Posted 3:41 PM

Tags: legal malpractice, attorney malpractice, malpractice insurance, hammer clause
Share |


No Comments


Post a Comment
Required
Required (Not Displayed)
Required


All comments are moderated and stripped of HTML.

NOTICE: This blog and website are made available by the publisher for educational and informational purposes only. It is not be used as a substitute for competent insurance, legal, or tax advice from a licensed professional in your state. By using this blog site you understand that there is no broker client relationship between you and the blog and website publisher.
Blog Archive
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2013
  • 2011

  • lawyers professional liability insurance(429)
  • attorney malpractice insurance(398)
  • attorney malpractice(337)
  • legal malpractice(225)
  • legal liability(134)
  • cyber insurance(106)
  • data breach(92)
  • ethics(87)
  • erp(57)
  • malpractice insurance(55)
  • claims(39)
  • title agency e&o(36)
  • accountant e&o(34)
  • extended reporting period endorsement(30)
  • tail(29)
  • phishing(25)
  • legal malpractice insurance(23)
  • prior acts(22)
  • claims made coverage(21)
  • extended reporting period(21)
  • cyber security(20)
  • cyber liability(18)
  • accountant errors & omissions(18)
  • claims reporting(18)
  • crime insurance(16)
  • ransomware(16)
  • claim prevention(16)
  • attorney protective cle(14)
  • the hartford weekly newsletter(14)
  • attorney protective cle webinar(14)
  • 2022 mcgowan pro cpe webinar for accountants(13)
  • professional liability insurance(13)
  • mcgowan webinar series for cpas 2021(12)
  • retirement tail(12)
  • attpro tip of the month(12)
  • business owners insurance(11)
  • legal liability insurance(11)
  • fee suits(10)
  • full prior acts(10)
  • cyber crime(10)
  • accountant errors & omissions insurance(10)
  • prior acts date(9)
  • step rating(9)
  • non-practicing erp(9)
  • bop(9)
  • cyber liability insurance(9)
  • title agent errors & omissions(9)
  • claims made(9)
  • webinar(8)
  • lawyers(8)

View Mobile Version
Logo
Quick Links
Home Our Products Customer Service Payment Options Common Terms
About Us Refer A Friend Our Carriers Blog Contact Us
Location
2430 Camelot Ct SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49546

Local: 616.940.1101
Toll Free: 866.940.1101
Email: info@L2ins.com
Facebook Twitter Social LinkedIn
© Copyright. All rights reserved.
Powered by Insurance Website Builder