Call Us 866.940.1101 ☰ ˟
866.940.1101
Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Employee Directory
    • Partners Page
    • Event Calendar
    • Refer a Friend
  • Get A Quote
  • Products
    • Lawyers Malpractice Insurance
    • Professional Liability Coverage For Attorneys
    • Accountants Professional Liability
    • Dentist Malpractice Insurance
    • Business Owners Policy
    • Cyber Liability Insurance
    • Workers Compensation Insurance
    • Title Agents E&O Insurance
    • Paralegal Malpractice Insurance
  • Testimonials
  • Common Terms
    • Common Terms
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Areas We Serve
    • Grand Rapids, MI
    • Detroit, MI
    • Lansing, MI
    • Kalamazoo, MI
Home > Blog > Attorney Malpractice--Who is an Innocent Insured?
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2017

Attorney Malpractice--Who is an Innocent Insured?

What is an Innocent Insured and where is that clause in my policy continues to be one of the most asked questions.   It is also a clause that has promoted countless amounts of litigation.

Deliberate or illegal acts are normally not insurable either by rule of law or the insurance language in a particular policy.  But what happens when a firm member commits an act that is clearly illegal or deliberate and thereby excluded from coverage.  This “deliberate” act may also cause there to be a malpractice claim that normally would be covered.  Is it fair to the rest of a firm, if they did not know or participate in the excluded act to not have attorney malpractice coverage for is incident? 

The “innocent insured” clause in a policy is intended to provide coverage for the “innocent” parties that are members of the firm so that they are not left with insurance protection.  As each malpractice insurance policy is different, this “clause” may differ in wording and may not be called an “innocent insured” clause, while the intent remains the same.

The current AXIS Lawyers Professional Liability Insurance policy is just one such policy.  The “innocent Insured” clause is buried as part of the deliberate acts exclusions:

4.   Fraudulent, Criminal, Malicious, Deliberately Wrongful Acts, or Omissions. This policy does not

apply to any claim based upon or arising out of any dishonest, fraudulent, criminal, malicious or deliberately wrongful acts or omissions committed by you.

 

This exclusion shall not apply to a claim until and unless such conduct is evidenced by any judgment, final adjudication, alternate dispute resolution proceeding or written admission by you.

 

This exclusion does not apply to those of you who did not personally commit, personally participate in committing, or remain passive after learning about one or more of the acts or omissions described in this exclusion.  However, our obligation to provide coverage in any such case shall be excess of the deductible and excess of the full extent of any assets in the named insured, or monetary value attributed to such assets, of anyone to whom this exclusion applies.

This exclusion shall not apply to claims alleging personal injury.

 

Even though the clause and intent are clear, where does the litigation start?  I have not yet met a lawyer that enjoys completing their attorney malpractice applications.  So if one member of the firm handles it without complaint, very few people we ask any questions.  What if the party that is completing the application firm’s application(s), is also the party that is committing the acts that would normally be excluded from coverage because they were considered deliberate acts?  You now have the attorney malpractice carrier crying foul because there was a material misrepresentation to the malpractice insurance carrier on the law firm’s application.

One example of this was a multi-lawyer firm where the partner that was completing the malpractice applications was also the lawyer that was stealing money from his clients.  The attorney that had committed the illegal acts committed suicide when discovered.  The former clients now sue the firm to recover the stolen funds and for attorney malpractice.  The other partners had no involvement in the scam and no knowledge of the scam.  Yet year after year the firm’s applications were completed stating that the firm had “no knowledge” of any act that could lead to a potential claim signed by the offending partner.  The firm’s malpractice policy did have an “innocent insured” clause.  Should the malpractice carrier provide a defense for the firm and pay the claims or should they be able to rescind coverage because of the material misrepresentations made in years of applications?

 

Note:  The above is general information about a Claims Made Insurance policy concept.  Different insurance policies and different situations may or may not treat these concepts in a similar manner.

Posted 1:33 PM

Tags: attorney malpractice insurance, lawyers professional liability insurance, innocent insured
Share |


No Comments


Post a Comment
Required
Required (Not Displayed)
Required


All comments are moderated and stripped of HTML.

NOTICE: This blog and website are made available by the publisher for educational and informational purposes only. It is not be used as a substitute for competent insurance, legal, or tax advice from a licensed professional in your state. By using this blog site you understand that there is no broker client relationship between you and the blog and website publisher.
Blog Archive
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2013
  • 2011

  • lawyers professional liability insurance(429)
  • attorney malpractice insurance(400)
  • attorney malpractice(337)
  • legal malpractice(225)
  • legal liability(134)
  • cyber insurance(106)
  • data breach(92)
  • ethics(87)
  • erp(57)
  • malpractice insurance(55)
  • claims(39)
  • title agency e&o(36)
  • accountant e&o(34)
  • extended reporting period endorsement(30)
  • tail(29)
  • phishing(25)
  • legal malpractice insurance(23)
  • prior acts(22)
  • claims made coverage(21)
  • extended reporting period(21)
  • cyber security(20)
  • cyber liability(18)
  • accountant errors & omissions(18)
  • claims reporting(18)
  • crime insurance(16)
  • ransomware(16)
  • claim prevention(16)
  • attorney protective cle(14)
  • the hartford weekly newsletter(14)
  • attorney protective cle webinar(14)
  • 2022 mcgowan pro cpe webinar for accountants(13)
  • professional liability insurance(13)
  • mcgowan webinar series for cpas 2021(12)
  • retirement tail(12)
  • attpro tip of the month(12)
  • business owners insurance(11)
  • legal liability insurance(11)
  • fee suits(10)
  • full prior acts(10)
  • cyber crime(10)
  • accountant errors & omissions insurance(10)
  • prior acts date(9)
  • step rating(9)
  • non-practicing erp(9)
  • bop(9)
  • cyber liability insurance(9)
  • title agent errors & omissions(9)
  • claims made(9)
  • coverage(8)
  • webinar(8)

View Mobile Version
Logo
Quick Links
Home Our Products Customer Service Payment Options Common Terms
About Us Refer A Friend Our Carriers Blog Contact Us
Location
2430 Camelot Ct SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49546

Local: 616.940.1101
Toll Free: 866.940.1101
Email: info@L2ins.com
Facebook Twitter Social LinkedIn
© Copyright. All rights reserved.
Powered by Insurance Website Builder