AdmonishmentColorado Attorney agreed to aid in negotiating a judgement obtained against his in-laws.  The in-laws live in Minnesota where a judgement was obtained against them for $2368.13 in favor of a condominium association.

The Colorado Attorney sent e-mail to the Minnesota Attorney that represented the condo association stating that he was representing his in-laws in this matter and to send all future correspondence to him.   A number of e-mails were sent back and forth on this matter between the attorneys.  Minnesota Ethics panel stated that although he was not paid in this matter, he was practicing law in Minnesota without a license.

As always, attorneys should make sure that they follow the same procedures regarding client intake regardless of the relationship that the attorney has with the potential client.  Getting involved with any matter that either the attorney is not licensed in a state or not familiar with the type of law needed to address the matter may have consequences far beyond the “simple” matter.

 

Lee Norcross 
Contact Me Today
Lee Norcross, MBA, CPCU

Managing Director, CEO

(616) 940-1101 Ext. 7080 
Share |


No Comments


Post a Comment
Name
Required
E-Mail
Required (Not Displayed)
Comment
Required


All comments are moderated and stripped of HTML.
Submission Validation
Required
CAPTCHA
Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
 
Enter the Validation Code from above.
NOTICE: This blog and website are made available by the publisher for educational and informational purposes only. It is not be used as a substitute for competent insurance, legal, or tax advice from a licensed professional in your state. By using this blog site you understand that there is no broker client relationship between you and the blog and website publisher.
Blog Archive
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2013
  • 2011


View Mobile Version