Is a Free Non-Practicing Attorney Malpractice Tail Right for You?
Attorneys spend years looking forward to retirement and the opportunity to obtain a “free” non-practicing Extended Reporting Period (ERP), often referred to as a retirement tail. On the surface, it sounds like an easy decision: retire from practice, receive an unlimited reporting period at no additional premium, and eliminate the ongoing cost of malpractice insurance.
However, reality is often more complicated.
Attorneys often misunderstand the free non-practicing ERP. What lawyers fail to realize is that this coverage is for attorneys who completely and permanently stop practicing law. For attorneys considering part-time practice, referrals, consulting, or the possibility of returning to practice in the future, accepting a free retirement tail may create significant coverage issues.
Understanding How Attorney Malpractice Insurance Works
Lawyer professional liability policies are claims-made policies. Under a claims-made policy to cover a reported claim:
-
-
- The alleged malpractice must occur after the policy’s retroactive date.
- The policy is inforce when making the claim or during an applicable extended reporting period.
-
When an attorney retires and cancels a claims-made policy, claims reporting coverage ends without an Extended Reporting Period Endorsement. That is where the retirement ERP comes into play.
An Extended Reporting Period does not create new coverage. Instead, it extends the time for reporting claims for work performed while the policy was active.
What Is a Free Non-Practicing ERP?
Certain malpractice insurers offer a retirement or non-practicing ERP to attorneys who meet certain eligibility requirements. Typical requirements may include:
-
-
- Continuous coverage with the insurer for a specified number of years.
- Permanent retirement or cessation of the practice of law.
- Timely written notice to the insurer.
- No longer providing legal services for compensation.
-
The purpose of the non-practicing ERP is straightforward: protect an attorney against future claims arising from past legal services after the attorney has permanently left private practice.
When a Free Retirement Tail Makes Sense
It is appropriate when:
-
-
- You Are Fully Retiring-If you have no intention of practicing law again, a non-practicing ERP can provide long-term protection against future malpractice claims arising from your prior work. ,
- You Are Leaving a Firm That Will Continue Operations-In situations where a retiring attorney may leave a law firm that continues to maintain its own claims-made coverage. The retiring attorney’s ERP may serve as supplemental protection while the firm continues carrying malpractice insurance.
- You Are Moving into Certain Non-Practicing Roles-Some insurers permit attorneys who become judges or move into certain non-practicing positions to utilize a retirement ERP, provided they are no longer engaged in private practice.
-
When a Free Non-Practicing Tail May Not Be Right for You
This is where attorneys encounter unexpected problems:
-
-
- You Might Return to Practice Someday
-
One of the most important limitations is that certain policies provide that if the attorney resumes providing legal services, coverage under the non-practicing ERP terminates. While policy language varies frequently states that if the insured resumes rendering professional services for any reason, coverage under the endorsement ends. There are a few exceptions.
This can create a serious coverage gap.
An attorney who returns to practice may discover that:
-
-
-
- The retirement ERP is no longer in force.
- New malpractice coverage may be issued without prior acts coverage.
- Restoring prior acts coverage can be difficult and expensive.
-
-
-
-
- You Want to Practice Part-Time
-
-
-
-
- Semi-retired attorneys assume they can keep existing clients, perform occasional legal work, or provide limited legal advice while maintaining the free retirement tail.
- Non-practicing ERPs are for attorneys who have completely ceased practicing law. Even limited legal work may jeopardize eligibility or continued coverage.
-
-
-
-
- You Plan to Receive Referral Fees
-
Attorneys who intend to continue generating referral business should carefully review policy terms. Insurers consider referral activity practicing law. As a result, a non-practicing ERP may not be the most appropriate solution.
-
-
- You Intend to Join Another Firm
-
If you are closing your practice but plan to work for another law firm, a non-practicing tail is often not the right answer. Instead, you should evaluate how your future malpractice coverage will address both ongoing and prior acts exposure.
-
-
- Special Considerations
-
-
-
-
- A free non-practicing ERP often protects only the retiring attorney. If the firm historically employed associate attorneys or has predecessor firm exposure, there may be uninsured risks remaining after retirement.
- Purchasing a firm ERP may provide more appropriate protection than relying solely on an individual retirement endorsement.
-
-
Questions Every Attorney Should Ask Before Taking the Free ERP
Before electing a non-practicing retirement tail, consider:
-
-
-
- Am I truly finished practicing law?
- Could I return to practice in the future?
- Do I plan to retain any clients?
- Will I perform legal work on a limited basis?
- Will I receive referral fees?
- Does my firm have predecessor firm exposure?
- Would a firm ERP provide broader protection?
- What would happen if I decided to practice again five years from now?
-
-
In Summary
For lawyers intending on completely retiring this benefit provides long-term protection for prior legal work without the significant cost associated with purchasing a separate tail policy.
However, attorneys who plan to practice part-time, keep clients, generate referrals, move to another firm, or maintain the option of returning to practice should proceed carefully. Returning to legal practice may terminate the non-practicing ERP and potentially create costly gaps in prior acts coverage.
Retirement planning for attorneys is more than simply ending malpractice coverage. As an attorney nears retirement the right decision requires careful review of policy language, future career plans, and the firm’s ongoing exposure. Understanding these issues before retirement can help avoid unpleasant surprises later.
Request a Legal Malpractice Quote
Contact Me Today
Lee Norcross, MBA, CPCU
California License # 0D87292
L Squared Insurance Agency, LLC ® DBA in California as L2 L Squared Insurance Agency, License # 0L93416
Managing Director, CEO
Lee@L2Ins.com
616-726-7080
