Call Us Today For A Free Quote | 866.940.1101
Professionals Insuring Professionals
 

Completing AOP GridWhen completing the attorney malpractice insurance application a frequent question is how to fill out the area of practice grid (AOP).  I suspect that it is frequently done incorrectly.

For firms that are currently in operation for over a year:

The attorney malpractice application AOP grid asks for your AOP for the past year in 1 of 2 different methods:

1.       either a percentage of billable hours or;

2.       a percentage of revenue

for each area of practice. 

Some attorneys become frustrated because the firm may have changed their practice area direction recently.  The firm is now concentrating on new practice areas different from what they did in the past.  They want the legal malpractice application AOP grid to reflect what they just started doing or what they now plan on doing.  Why would the application not allow for having a new “planned” AOP?

Attorney malpractice insurance is written on a ‘claims made’ policy form.  The claims made policy inforce at the time a claim is made provides coverage back to the inception date of continuous claims made coverage once a prior acts date is established and maintained.  The malpractice insurer wants to charge a premium for the risks that are associated with the firm’s past exposures, as this is where the claims will be made from.  The revised AOP exposures are for future renewal applications that will reflect the firm’s ‘new’ direction.

For firms that have just formed without a track record:

For the attorney just establishing their firm, the firm needs to complete the attorney malpractice AOP grid in a prospective manner for the 1st year.  This is in spite of the application asking the AOP question in a retrospective way.  The malpractice insurer understands that in 1st year for a new law firm what is planned or budgeted may be different then what happens.   As long as the law firm makes a good faith effort in completing the AOP grid there should not be an issue.  Barring a material change to the law firm, mid-way through the 1st year, there is normally not a need to tell the insurer that the firm has pick up a client for work in a different AOP then was disclosed on the attorney malpractice application.  Any AOP grid changes along with other operational differences from the ‘1st year plan’ can be disclosed during the attorney malpractice renewal application process. 

 

While not reporting AOP changes midterm is okay, it is important that material changes such as attorney changes or a claims being made against the firm be reported to the insurer as soon as practical.

Share |


No Comments


Post a Comment
Name
Required
E-Mail
Required (Not Displayed)
Comment
Required


All comments are moderated and stripped of HTML.
Submission Validation
Required
CAPTCHA
Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
 
Enter the Validation Code from above.
NOTICE: This blog and website are made available by the publisher for educational and informational purposes only. It is not be used as a substitute for competent insurance, legal, or tax advice from a licensed professional in your state. By using this blog site you understand that there is no broker client relationship between you and the blog and website publisher.
Blog Archive


View Mobile Version
Quick Contact
Referrals
We love referrals! And thank you even more for your continued business.
Customer Service
Self policy service any time of the day, directly from our website.
Join Our Newsletter
Stay in touch with the latest events, news and offers we have.
From Our Blog From Our Customers
Read More Read More
Stay In Touch With Us Helpful Site Links Read the News
Sign up now to receive new and updates Stay up-to-date with the latest industry, community and agency news through our newscenter. We also provide handy hints on how to save on your insurance.

Read More
We have the expertise to find you the right coverage at the right price 
Powered by Insurance Website Builder